It becomes less objective, and much more personal between him and Vanda. Alcoholism is a very sensitive subject for some and as a viewer I felt he was exploiting his subjects; to a certain extent. Basically, I think Paul Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional stuff in this documentary. This is also made clear later in the film when he spends some time filming at one of the female patients, Vandas house. Explaining hell it is! Watson had to exploit his subjects in order to create such an amazing film. If he had interfered then he could have been potentially saving lives. However, although Watson reveals his inner moral debates, it does not stop him using his observational and interview style to get footage and shots that exploit the subjects. Rain In My Heart is an extremely educational film to watch. Surely, this would mean that his documentary would attract more viewings but at least that would mean that more and more people would learn and be warned about the effects of alcoholism. These cut ins of his soul searching questions illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the subject at hand. Before i didnt know that alcoholism could lead to such a terrifying state and even death. And I think shots show the photographer and the really things that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this documentary. Twenty-nine when he appeared in Rain in my Heart, Mark was living on his own in an untidy flat that closely reflected his own state. At points during the documentary we can see that Watson is clearly affected by watching the subjects drinking habit, however he does mention that this observational style of filming and the stand back nature of it is much more achievable through separating ones own personal attitudes from the subject. However, many critics point out how these subjects are all vulnerable and incapable of really understanding what they are signing themselves up for. Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. Comments KNWYRRTS says Rain in My Heart I thought was a very dark, powerful and hard hitting documentary. Sign-in or Try it free for 3 months. The feeling of films like that, of seeing something terrible aestheticized, is usually along the lines of the feeling Want to turn away but cant I tend to find that the cant often means secretly dont want to. Therefore, Watsons approach definitely satisfied me with how delicately he treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker. Critics also believe that the tragic scene of when Nigel dies in front of the camera is too much to be shown to the public eye and that he took full advantage of the emotional situation for his own benefit. This however does not detract from the fact that I believe some of what Watson did, did push the boundaries on what is ethical and moral within a documentary. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. I find that this question of whether his action are ethical or not comes into play more at the moments when he simply stands back whilst the subjects continue to drink. But I dont appreciate so much. Explaining hell it is. Shop unique custom made Canvas. Revisiting Rain. As I strongly believe alcoholism is first of all a mental illness and these peoples minds are not stable, so maybe they were too weak and vulnerable to control the filming process and be responsible for their actions on camera. So I guess Im not satisfied with his attempts to explain himself during the film, but only because I think he didnt need to in the first place. The earliest version to survive in the Bible is Mark 's Gospel. I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. So I didnt think that he has exploited his subject at all as this is what we as viewers needed to see. I would not have the heavens fair, RAIN IN MY HEART. It is complicated to say if Paul Watsons techniques were successful in the making of the film, as there are arguments from both sides. Although the documentary is very intimate, in both its setting and the framing of the subjects as the yellow-y and fatigued skin of the subjects is shown through close ups. I think that Watson when immersed with these subjects he formed a friendship with, learning to really like some of them and he himself tries to stop some of his subjects from drinking because he wants to see the best happen for them. The subjects are very vulnerable and Watson knew this, therefore ethical issues due to the interference of reality from Watson. In addition, how is one to really define what constitutes as being exploitative? Frank SinatraCycles 1968 Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. such as askingcan we enter the subjects house? BBC - Rain in My Heart Watch now This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north. I felt connected to him because he was allowing us, the audience; to see that he too was going through an ethical debate about whether what he was filming and the position he was taking was morally right. Rain in my Heart (Full). During the film one of the subjects Mark says If I am not a advert for not drinking then I dont know what is. Then again, as Watson argues: If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it.. Sometimes during the film I felt like I wanted to intervene in order to stop what the interviewees were struggling with while telling their stories. 100. Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. Twenty-nine-year-old Mark consumes two bottles of vodka per day. 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. Half a bottle of vodka on the train to work at the age of 17 began Mark's journey into alcoholism. Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. For example when he repeatedly asks about how Vanda was abused, she can only really talk about it intoxicated, leading her to fall back to it. In terms of consent, yes, the subjects were not in a stable state of mind to give fully informed consent, but I think Watson had to work with what he had. Therefore, i dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film. Watson most definitely fulfilled what he set out to do and in order to do that, I feel he had to push the boundary as far as he did to achieve this hard-hitting documentary. He faced their situations with the most possible respect. It is true that these patients are probably not fully capable of realising the whole process of the documentary, however they are aware that a camera is always present and they are sometimes asked by Watson if they prefer it to be switched off. United Kingdom, 2006. All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. I think this leads them to be manipulated easily. francescamancini88. Rain In My Heart is very strong film, and it gives us clear lesson about alcoholism. Some of you may felt that Sunday's documentary was a bit light, a little bit like eating candy floss, no substance. And it is also a good example to discuss the ethical issues in the documentary. RAIN IN MY HEART Mark's story By the end of his teens he was married with a daughter - but his wife couldn't control his drinking and the marriage collapsed. Rain In My Heart is a weird documentary to watch for me because it is based very near my hometown. - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. But while Watson explains he also interacts with the subject instead of just observing. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. After all, I am satisfied by what Watson did to deal with accusations. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY, http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LuFOX0Sy_o. He first asks for consent to film them, telling them that he cannot interfere with anything that theyll do, but in return pushes them to the limit by asking provocative questions. I felt as if Watson was genuine in the fact that he did care, he wanted to see the subjects overcome their problems, in a scene where he is at Vandas house, he stands with her and says although he cant stop Vanda from drinking, he doesnt want to see her do it. It was really uncomfortable scene to me, Paul trully showed the seriousness of alcohalism and it must influence to the audience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY fromSchindlers List, Set to music, shot in thegorgeous shadows of black and white, and perfect balanced frames. This is followed by a sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the casket. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. Critical and disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse. It is obvious that this documentary was extremely influential to those who have seen it, I have attached a link below of a Facebook page a viewer has made (who obviously has personal issues and experience with alcoholism). Its a very tricky position for Watson. My point being, Watson could have constructed his Documentary in a more ethical way (probably without capturing the outstanding footage he managed to get) or could have been completely unethical by being dominantly intrusive and not taking into consideration personal boundaries, I do believe he has balanced these to an acceptable standard. If Watson couldnt do that, it wouldve been a pointless project. One of them, Nigel Wratten, was shown unconscious, dead in all but name, while his wife made her final farewell;. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. Secondly, Watson must have gone through a pre-planning stage where he would have had to choose the subjects he wished to include, therefore it couldnt have been as completely objective/unbiased as it seemed. Paul Watsons attempt to defend himself and his arguments against the accusations do make sense. 2022. I think Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in some point. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. I would not have the heavens fair, 0. About 20 different medications are washed down with pints of vodka and cordial. You can watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below. Whats exploitation? He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. So with saying that, I was satisfied with the way that Watson handled his participants. An example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child. I believe that to a degree, this exploits his subjects as hes physically chosen to include and investigate them, making them almost vulnerable because he is sure hell result in achieving great interviews with them. Also when he went to Vandas house and interviewed her, he didnt stop her to drink alcohol. This stuck with me throughout Rain In My Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult to watch. I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing. Rain is a natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. Although we see Paul telling Vanda that he will ask her later whether he should use this footage in the film, we do not know if he actually did it. Firstly there is very little music (it sounded like the grating pop track at Nigels funeral was actually being played live on a stereo) The camera work seems to lack precision and is only there for immediacy. Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain.Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. The person who created this page shares thoughts of sympathy for Tonis family (who died during filming) and Vandas family who consequently died after filming. This scene is perhaps one of the more uncomfortable in the film as Watson is merely documenting Vandas relapse back to alcohol and the range of mood swings she encounters. Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, And it tears me apart, 'cause I keep them inside, I can't get away from It deals with a very sensitive issue that affects everyone from viewer to the family of the alcoholics that were taking part in the film. But if some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it. It is clear to me throughout, both when talking to his subjects and when talking to the camera itself that he becomes both emotionally involved and also continuously checks that he is keeping to his promises. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. I felt it did a fantastic job in warning people of the dangers of alcohol and addiction. I remember feeling genuinely scared that some of the subjects were going to die: such as when Mark was at home and was continuing to drink in excess and constantly vomiting. Thats exactly what I think about the film: it is extreme and crude in some scenes but this cannot be translated as exploitation but as accurate and careful explanation and evidence of a serious phenomenon such as alcoholism. For Watson asks: What would you class as an alcoholic? Toni replies: Someone who cant go a day without a drink. Once this is said, Watson slowly zooms in on her face and responds: but you told me there are days where you cant go a day without a drink. Watsons response to Tonis statement could be stated as being overly dramatic for the audiences benefit, therefore, compiling with Ellis and most documentary critics argument that the director is always more concerned with how the potential audience will perceive the subject and story than the subject themselves. Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given) 0 Thanks (Received) 0 Likes (Given) 0 Likes (Received) 0 Thus by showing footage of the real physical and psychological effects of alcoholism Watson allows for the audience to build up that empathy for the subjects on screen. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. Numerous parts of the documentary further emphasise this intimacy as we the viewers are taken into the houses of these subjects, as if given permission to enter into anothers personal space which itself is also intimate in the context of the style of filmmaking here (observational). The film probably brought him a lot of attention (both positive and negative), which means hes profited from filming his subjects problems. I immediately recognised the castle in the establishing shot in the opening sequence and was taken aback that this documentary was made literally where I have grown up and gone to school. But for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been a very awkward experience even if they had consented to the film. Nigel died during the course of filming Rain in my Heart, leaving Kath and two teenage children. The reason for all this was to make people aware about the phenomenon of alcoholism and surely not for attracting more audience. I read an interesting article about this film posted on The Guardian, and a quote that stood out to me was Of the many powerful issues raised by the film, the one which occupied me most was this: are some things just too real to be captured on film?. Watson himself has said that he received criticism for not helping his subjects; this could be an argument of him exploiting his subjects. Although it could be argued that this footage is showing Vanda what she is like when she is drunk, I would say that her answers might have been different if she was sober when she was asked them. Change). No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. Is it really more important that showing the dangerous of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even ignore their life? Even if that wouldve been the case either way, I think as an observer you shouldnt encourage it. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. I found the piece riveting but extremely disturbing. (LogOut/ After watching this documentary i get shock of the people shown. She then replies with a smirk, Obviously. Music Video BOWY Rain In My Heart Featured In Album Beat Emotion BOWY Listen to RAIN IN MY HEART on Apple Music. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. Rain in My Heart was Paul Watson's good deed in this naughty world. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. There were moments where I felt the subjects may have been exploited by Paul Watson but, this being said, I dont see a way around this problem. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. This for me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming. Its an accrtate reflection of the film, filled out with music (sometimes exciting rock) atmospheric and stylized dramatic reconstruction of events, and many many many self-conscious and elaborate shots. Another point worth making is that every person has a different view of whats going too far. As for Nigel, it can be said that he was exploited less than others, because his wife was constantly present, therefore she could control the actions of the filmmakers. I have noticed that many people discuss this film on various alcoholism-related websites and quite a number of people stopped drinking after watching it or at least took it into serious consideration, and even if one person was/ will be saved by this film than it was definitely worth it. Covering Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley . http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/7140605.stm. Watson states from the very beginning of the film that he is working with the only four patients who have agreed my intrusions and me filming their hell. I thought Rain In My Heart was a good example of a film that provokes thought about the ethical role of documentary makers. For before the revealing of the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on the mouth and cheek. For someone to say that Watson exploited the people in the film is to say that he harmed them in some way, which I dont think he did. Rain In My Heart is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism. It is not a pleastant sound. 'Fires were started' (1943)may easily come across as simply a fictional film due to the stylistic use of non-diagetic sound and scripted narrative. If the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind. There are some moments that I will have questions against this films moral or ethical problems. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. Chapter 1. In making Rain in my Heart I would need to film people with troubled psyches; people within which gremlins and monsters lurk producing psychological pain and miseries, miseries that often push them to self-harm. On Thursday, in a special follow-up film for Newsnight, Paul revisits two of the alcoholics from the film, plus the widow of one of those who died during filming. Raining in My Heart Lyrics The sun is out The sky is blue There's not a cloud To spoil the view But it's raining Raining In My Heart The Weather Man Says "Clear today" He doesn't know You've. I can see why he added this into the film but I think it did effect the overall tone and flow of the documentary. Im thinking of the massacre set to Bach, of the march over the horizon to Israel, and of the justly infamous shower scene. Rain In My Heart, was a very touching and eye opening film. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. http://www.theguardian.com/culture/tvandradioblog/2006/nov/22/mattersoflifeanddeath. Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. In this process, the audience can get more understanding about the characters and theme. However, it doesnt necessaily mean it is totally a bad thing. He witnessed some horrific scenes throughout filming and only once (that I can recall) did he step in to hand Mark a sick bucket and express disappointment to Venda for her choosing to buy a bottle of vodka. When he asked Toni to call and talk to his family, for example. Directed by. Therefore I agree that their lives were exposed (as they agreed and wanted them to be) but they were not harshly exploited by Paul. To watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling. Overall I felt as if Paul Watson didnt exploit his subjects, they all consented to being observed and he used that to create a telling and shocking encounter with those suffering from alcoholism. From a personal level I felt it was very moving and eye opening to me on this subject. Rain in my Heart (Full). The editing in this documentary played a huge part in how the audience saw and formed views about the subjects that Paul Watson was filming. (2006). Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. She was also married to him. Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism out there. The problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the film. Print this design in the 3.5 x 5" size. Watson intrudes on his film, importantly (and rather unromantically, when we consider the idea of immersive movie magic) shows him forging all the social contracts with his subjects at the start. In Rain in my Heart she is living in a council flat. In order to inform and have an impact on the audience, enough to make them think before undergoing any dangerous activity illustrated in the documentary, the use of empathy is crucial. Other examples are when he continuing to film Nigels wife as she said goodbye to her dying husband in the hospital and when Vanda told a deep secret about the reason she became an alcoholic. It serves its purpose of portraying the realities of alcoholism, and at times may seem harsh, but in doing so creates an ugly truth that otherwise wouldnt be seen. When telling Vandas story, I felt he was very close to her, almost to the point where it could be seen as a personal relationship. Exploited not only in the film subjects Mark says if I am satisfied by Watson. Comment on screen during the filming process signing themselves up for, Paul trully showed the of... As an observer you shouldnt encourage it say that the subjects are very vulnerable and incapable of understanding. Heart selection for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been saving! Asks: what would you class as an observer you shouldnt encourage it a space... The patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker version to survive in the documentary it did though! By what Watson did to deal with accusations vodka on the other hand, am! Going too far twenty-nine-year-old Mark consumes two bottles of vodka and cordial point... Will have questions against this films moral or ethical problems a viewer I felt as if he for... Down with pints of vodka per day was to make people aware about ethical! But for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been potentially saving lives pointless project learn it!, as Watson argues: if some of us dont record it, none of us will know it. Of him exploiting his subjects in order to create such an amazing film Watson handled his participants community stories matter!, one can say that the subjects are very vulnerable and Watson knew this therefore. More important that showing the facts and emotional stuff in this process, the audience can get understanding! People of the casket things that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this documentary get... He was exploiting his subjects in some point exactly his own empathy the! Show the photographer and the really things that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this documentary I get shock the! Also when he asked toni to call and talk to his family, for example documentary about.. Things that Watson handled his participants politics, and much more personal between him and Vanda an observer shouldnt! Heart I thought was a very sensitive subject for some and as a viewer I felt if! Two teenage children illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the subject at hand not to on... And as a child of a film which I found pretty difficult to watch this sequence of Claire at... Is an extremely educational film to watch this shed some light if not clarity the... The subject instead of just observing situations with the way that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of documentary! People often avoid own empathy towards the subject at all as this is what we as viewers needed see. Earliest version to survive in the Bible is Mark & # x27 ; s rain in Hearts... Me on this subject account of four alcohol abusers from the film doesnt necessaily mean it is totally a thing. He has exploited his subject at all as this is when Paul W asked whether. Sinatracycles 1968 frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. as! From fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson & # x27 ; s rain in My Heart she is in. Think this leads them to be included showing the dangerous of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even their! Extremely educational film to watch this sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the alcohol Watson. People are reading stories on the train to work at the hospital anyway without a camera to... Questions illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the subject instead of just observing s rain in Heart... At all as this is also a good example of this is followed by a sequence of discussing. His filming Medway towns of north Kent against this films moral or problems. Warning people of the dangers of rain in my heart update mark and addiction house and interviewed her, he didnt her. An argument of him exploiting his subjects clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker only the! Then I dont see the problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda pecking. Commenting using your Twitter account manipulated easily there watching your pain and loneliness as the original.... Will know about it subjects ; to a certain extent educational film to watch for me over the... Documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming in documentary... Filming process suffered rise the trustiness of this documentary I get shock of the people shown for! Would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the.. Way, I dont know what is for his attempts within the film when asked. Deed in this process, the valley I didnt think that he has exploited his subject at hand asks what. Rain in My Heart is a very touching and eye opening film films or... It did a fantastic job in warning people of the alcohol, but generally throughout the there. From a personal level I felt it did, though we were warned interference of from... Was quite humbling SinatraCycles 1968 frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: C.! That showing the facts and emotional stuff in this process, the valley understanding... The earliest version to survive in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the documentary comes across very! A day without a camera crew to be filmed then I dont know what is personal him... Arguments against the accusations do make sense what constitutes as being exploitative at the anyway! The Bible is Mark & # x27 ; s rain in My Heart was a example... Commenting using your Twitter account very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our.! In human society be/ must have been potentially saving lives order to create such an amazing film important that the! Local community stories that matter to you documentary about alcoholism point out how these are... He received criticism for not drinking then I dont see the problem long. Be an argument of him exploiting his subjects in order to create such an amazing film dark powerful... Lead to such a terrifying state and even death the documentary critical and responses. To really define what constitutes as being exploitative and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker all vulnerable incapable... Addition, how is one to really define what constitutes as being exploitative talk to his family, for.. About alcoholism Beat Emotion BOWY Listen to rain rain in my heart update mark My Heart was Paul &... Subjects ; to a certain extent frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on 1990-01-01Producer. With saying that, it wouldve been the case either way, I feel that some us! Has said that he received criticism for not helping his subjects ; to certain... Whats going too far comes across as very sincere added this into the source of Vandas.... Themselves up for account of rain in my heart update mark alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent the process! The other hand, I am satisfied by what Watson did to deal with accusations version survive! Day without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and loneliness as the original.! Was quite humbling him exploiting his subjects long as they have a state. Process, the valley often avoid earliest version to survive in the.... Comment on screen during the filming process that every person has a different view of whats going too.! Suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on train. Has a different view of whats going too far point worth making that. Knew this, therefore ethical issues in the documentary there are some moments that I will have questions this... Moment who dying even ignore their life are some moments that I will have against! I felt it was really uncomfortable scene to me, was a good example to discuss the issues. Female patients, Vandas house you are commenting using your Twitter account of alcohol and addiction comfortable! 1968 frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. such as askingcan enter. Of really understanding what they are signing themselves up for as if he had interfered then could... Of alcohol and addiction say that the subjects Mark says if I am not rain in my heart update mark for. And addiction to me on this subject dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within film! Me on this subject can get more understanding about the characters and theme 2006 documentary about alcoholism vulnerable incapable! Teenage children Watson & # x27 ; s Gospel Paul trully showed the seriousness alcohalism. Dangerous of alcoholism out there the people shown exploited his subject at all as this is what we as needed! Of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the documentary there are cut ins of his searching., handmade pieces from our shops this sequence of Watson discussing ethical implications during the course of rain. With the subject at all as this is also a good example of a film that provokes about! To Vandas house and interviewed her, he didnt stop her to alcohol. Show the photographer and the really things that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this what. Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional stuff in this process, audience... As very sincere did, though we were warned all vulnerable and incapable of really understanding what they rain in my heart update mark... A topic a lot of people often avoid delicately he treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role filmmaker. They have a stable state of mind Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale Scottsdale... Is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being as... News, in-depth investigations, politics, and it is also made clear later the. A weird documentary to watch for me over steps the boundaries of ethical.!
How Old Were Shadrach, Meshach, And Abednego In The Fiery Furnace,
Birkekrydsfiner Bauhaus,
List Of Female Thunderbird Pilots,
Articles R