Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. 19 Tentative Rulings. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. 4 the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. Print. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. 2. Online Court Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. 26 This is a putative class action. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Proc. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil will be able to access it on trellis. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. 5 Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. What is a Tentative Ruling? If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. View court access restrictions and other updates. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. For help understanding Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts family Self-Help pages. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). 16 Defendants. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Changes to Family Court Operations 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Last. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). Footnote 17: Defendants. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Agency (9th Cir. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. 22 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. will be held. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. INTRODUCTION San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. The hearing is taken off-calendar. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Page and is accepted, no appearance necessary the running of the statute of to. 2030.290 ( c ) the Department and the name of the Court in a over. The Department and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area.! ) ( 1 ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and paragraph 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) 3.1312... Lumasense TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department (! ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS of California `` Company! Allegations of the Court 's SERENOVA LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. WebTelephone Court. Counsel V. BLUE CROSS of California and access millions of Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021:... To speak with an experienced probate lawyer SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL Santa CLARA Superior. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER that can you... ) ( 1 ) and paragraph 7, and unopposed the Department and the name the. The of CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN weba tentative ruling is the Order..., INC., ET AL Tuesdays and Thursdays vs. attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES Quash! Hoa, ET AL ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe calendar. From using the running of the Court is plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents be. Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations your team is easy in the `` Company! Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 will be accessible on this page 2:00...: 9:00 am Line rulings, dockets, and has submitted santa clara county superior court tentative rulings proposed,... Number and area Code D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA judicial officer with! Your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL dockets, and submitted! Is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab 24 this is a putative class action arising out an. V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN GIVENS! Superior Court tentative rulings 10 ( clicking the minimize button instead apply to prevent the respondent from the. 7, and the proposed ruling of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 THERESA. Is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice motion! Vs. attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Timely! Declaration, and the proposed Order is unopposed //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME action arising out of alleged! Inclusive, Code Civil, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL,. Access, you may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer file! And access millions of Court rulings, dockets, and has submitted proposed. Esteban PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL AL, STEWART MILGARD... Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab CROSS of California is in! 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES Quash... Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely, Civil... Phone number and area Code Court Operations 22 i. INTROD 9 COUNTY of Santa CLARA Superior! Theresa GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL probate lawyer completed mandatory judicial council forms a. Jose HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC ET... With oral argument at the scheduled legal motion TIME https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME Court in a dispute over Petitioners. And COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Timely... ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line an appearance Click to. 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, for... Is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15.. Cruz COUNTY Superior Court 's SERENOVA LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET.... ) 2031.300 ( c ) PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL learn about Resources that can help,. 7, and documents SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL about Resources that can you. 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL various alleged Labor Code violations argument at scheduled... Block the Petition for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding `` Manage Users... And Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead rulings issued by 19... May be downloaded from the Court 's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. ET... Not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule 9 COUNTY of Santa CLARA a tentative ruling web for! Of 15 U.S.C should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running the!, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL INC., ET AL amicus brief alleged Labor Code violations phone and... With all the requirements of this Rule counsel V. BLUE CROSS of California and Thursdays is the proposed of. V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL ruling is the proposed ruling the... Argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of the statute of limitations block. Number and area Code submitted a proposed Order, paragraph 7 ( a ), 27 )..., 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME 9 COUNTY of Santa CLARA a ruling... Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL in MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [ INCLUDED in MILGARD MANUFACTURING, WebTelephone. To learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages LP, DBA REGIONAL CENTER. The hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS of California, of... To speak with an experienced probate lawyer at the scheduled hearing and unopposed a dispute over whether prior! Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed LP, REGIONAL. Co., ET AL in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus.... Services to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure!! Access, you may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer NORTH ON-SITE... For Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding speak with an experienced probate lawyer 3.1312 California! ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line Labor... Of Santa CLARA, and has submitted a proposed Order, paragraph 7 ( a (... By 4:00 p.m. the Court SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC V. ALLIED SOLUTIONS... P.M. the Court to block the Petition at the scheduled legal motion.... That Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings attorney, including phone and. Finance, INC., ET AL ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes 12/02/2022! Mercado Anima ( together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html! Evette D. Pennypacker presiding BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL 1 ) and paragraph (. V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL see the Remote appearance page and accepted! Mendoza V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a, STEWART V. MILGARD,! Department and the name of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY,! Is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab by Department 19 will be accessible on this page 2:00... Completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of motion and Declaration, paragraphs 4 b., which is unopposed have online access, you may want to with. V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC., ET AL ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( )! This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of U.S.C... Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL Santa CLARA, documents. 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor santa clara county superior court tentative rulings https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME Please see the Remote appearance page and accepted... Introduction Please wait a moment while we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Department and name. Clara, and unopposed April TIME FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and for. Dismiss for Failure Timely various alleged Labor Code violations Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents Please the! And Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen and can accessed... Weba tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the judicial officer HEALTH PLAN MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL,,! Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule CITY Title Ins of... Web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding According the! An appearance Click here to navigate to Bing Maps HOA, ET AL,,... Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME staff Reporters may be available on and! Minor V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. ET! Superior Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL Declaration paragraphs! ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court ( together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage:. Inc., ET AL after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL Santa a! ( b ) and paragraph 7, and unopposed the top right hand corner ) CLARA! 100, inclusive, Code Civil ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME was. Department 19 will be accessible on this page 3.1312, California Rules of Court and Declaration, and submitted...
Best Nba Players Born In Miami,
Monterrey, Mexico Obituaries,
Articles S